<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ethereum on JoeSindel.com</title><link>https://joesindel.com/tags/ethereum/</link><description>Recent content in Ethereum on JoeSindel.com</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://joesindel.com/tags/ethereum/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>One-to-Many Beacon Nodes: Rethinking PoS Validator Topology</title><link>https://joesindel.com/posts/ethereum-beacon-node-topology/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://joesindel.com/posts/ethereum-beacon-node-topology/</guid><description>&lt;p>A proof-of-stake validator is not a monolith. It&amp;rsquo;s three processes coordinating tightly: a &lt;strong>validator client&lt;/strong> signing attestations and proposing blocks, a &lt;strong>beacon node&lt;/strong> participating in consensus, and an &lt;strong>execution client&lt;/strong> running EVM state. The simplest deployment binds them 1:1:1 — one validator paired with one beacon, one beacon paired with one execution client. That topology is fine when you&amp;rsquo;re running 32 ETH worth of stake on a home setup. It is not fine when you&amp;rsquo;re operating at the scale of a top-tier staking provider.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>